Applying machine learning and predictive modeling to retention and viral suppression in South African HIV treatment cohorts

By  Dr Mhairi Maskew   Kieran Sharpey-Schafer  Lucien De Voux  Thomas Crompton  Dr. Jacob Bor  Marcus Rennick   Admire Chirowodza  Dr. Jacqui Miot  Seithati Molefi  Chuka Onaga  |  | 

HIV treatment programs face challenges in identifying patients at risk for loss-to-follow-up and uncontrolled viremia. We applied predictive machine learning algorithms to anonymised, patientlevel HIV programmatic data from two districts in South Africa, 2016–2018. We developed patient risk scores for two outcomes: (1) visit attendance≤ 28 days of the next scheduled clinic visit and (2) suppression of the next HIV viral load (VL). Demographic, clinical, behavioral and laboratory data were investigated in multiple models as predictor variables of attending the next scheduled visit and VL results at the next test. Three classifcation algorithms (logistical regression, random forest and AdaBoost) were evaluated for building predictive models. Data were randomly sampled on a 70/30 split into a training and test set. The training set included a balanced set of positive and negative examples from which the classifcation algorithm could learn. The predictor variable data from the unseen test set were given to the model, and each predicted outcome was scored against known outcomes. Finally, we estimated performance metrics for each model in terms of sensitivity, specifcity, positive and negative predictive value and area under the curve (AUC). In total, 445,636 patients were included in the retention model and 363,977 in the VL model. The predictive metric (AUC) ranged from 0.69 for attendance at the next scheduled visit to 0.76 for VL suppression, suggesting that the model correctly classifed whether a scheduled visit would be attended in 2 of 3 patients and whether the VL result at the next test would be suppressed in approximately 3 of 4 patients. Variables that were important predictors of both outcomes included prior late visits, number of prior VL tests, time since their last visit, number of visits on their current regimen, age, and treatment duration. For retention, the number of visits at the current facility and the details of the next appointment date were also predictors, while for VL suppression, other predictors included the range of the previous VL value. Machine learning can identify HIV patients at risk for disengagement and unsuppressed VL. Predictive modeling can improve the targeting of interventions through diferentiated models of care before patients disengage from treatment programmes, increasing costefectiveness and improving patient outcomes.

Publication details

Scientifc Reports
#12
2022
12715
PDF
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16062-0